SEX SLAVERY AND ISLAM

A Kuwaiti woman who once ran for parliament has called for sex slavery to be legalised - and suggested that non-Muslim prisoners from war-torn countries would make suitable concubines.

Salwa al Mutairi argued buying a sex-slave would protect decent, devout and 'virile' Kuwaiti men from adultery because buying an imported sex partner would be tantamount to marriage.

And she even had an idea of where to 'purchase' these sex-salves - browsing through female prisoners of war in other countries.

Outrageous ideas: Salwa al-Mutairi's suggestions have provoked anger and disbelief

The political activist and TV host even suggested that it would be a better life for women in warring countries as the might die of starvation.

Mutairi claimed: 'There was no shame in it and it is not haram' (forbidden) under Islamic Sharia law.'

 

More...

• 'From now, embarrassment will end': Saudi King bans men from selling lingerie

She gave the example of Haroun al-Rashid, an 8th century Muslim leader who ruled over an area covered by modern-day Iran, Iraq and Syria and was rumoured to have 2,000 concubines.

Mutairi recommended that offices could be opened to run the sex trade in the same way that recruitment agencies provide housemaids.

Example: Mutairi cited Haroun al-Rashid as a man who also had concubines

She suggested shopping for prisoners of war so as to protect Kuwaiti men from being tempted to commit adultery or being seduced by other women's beauty.

'For example, in the Chechnyan war, surely there are female Russian captives,' she said.

'So go and buy those and sell them here in Kuwait. Better than to have our men engage in forbidden sexual relations.' 

Her unbelievable argument for her plan was that ‘captives’ might 'just die of hunger over there'.

She insisted, 'I don’t see any problem in this, no problem at all'.

In an attempt to consider the woman's feelings in the arrangement, Mutari conceded that the enslaved women, however, should be at least 15.

Browsing: Mutair says female war prisoners could be bought and kept as sex slaves

Mutairi said free women must be married with a contract but with concubines 'the man just buys her and that’s it. That’s enough to serve as marriage.' 

Her remarks, made in a video posted on YouTube last month and carried by newspapers in the Gulf states in recent days, have sparked outrage in cyber-space from fellow Kuwaitis and others in the wider region.

'Wonder how Salwa al Mutairi would’ve felt if during the occupation (of Kuwait) by Iraqi forces, she was sold as ‘war booty’ as she advocates for Chechen women,' tweeted Mona Eltahawy.

Another tweeter, Shireen Qudosi, told Mutairi 'you’re a disgrace to women everywhere'.

For Muna Khan, an editor at the Saudi-owned Al Arabiya television station, the 'icing on the cake' of Mutairi’s 'preposterous views' was her assertion that her suggestions do not conflict with the tenets of Islam.

Shopping for sex: Mutairi said that during a recent visit to Mecca, pictured, Saudi muftis said it was not forbidden to own a sex slave

Mutairi said that during a recent visit to Mecca, she asked Saudi muftis – Muslim religious scholars – what the Islamic ruling was on owning sex slaves. They are said to have told her that it is not haram.

The ruling was confirmed by 'specialized people of the faith' in Kuwait, she claimed.

'They said, that’s right, the only solution for a decent man who has the means, who is overpowered by desire and who does not want to commit fornication, is to acquire jawari.' Jawari is the plural of the Arabic term jariya, meaning 'concubine' or 'sex slave'.

One Saudi mufti supposedly told Mutairi: 'The context must be that of a Muslim nation conquering a non-Muslim nation, so these jawari have to be prisoners of war.' 

Concubines, she argued, would suit Muslim men who fear being 'seduced or tempted into immoral behaviour by the beauty of their female servants'.
 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2000292/Men-allowed-sex-slaves-female-prisoners-job--WOMAN-politician-Kuwait.html#ixzz2aU7XwQYc
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

A SERIOUS PLAN TO MALIGN ISLAM AND MUSLIMS

Muslims are now going to b confronted by US-promoted Imams through the Internet. Welcome to a new form of cyber warfare on Muslims!

If you are among the growing number of Muslims who get their information on Islam online, keep reading but with your antennas on alert. There is a conspiracy afoot to virtually misguide you. A new report released in February by the US global policy think tank RAND Corporation, entitled “Promoting Online Voices for Countering Violent Extremism,” discusses plans to more deeply infiltrate, co-opt and subvert popular sources of online Islamic information — websites, Facebook, Twitter, blogs and more — with disinformation that is packaged as Islamic guidance based on the Qur’an and Sunnah of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) but in reality is government propaganda aimed at aligning the political views and behavior of Muslims with imperialist interests.

The report’s authors, Todd C. Helmus, Erin York and Peter Chalk, all of whom have links with the US military (RAND originated as a project of an American military aircraft manufacturer), instruct government officials, nonprofit organizations and private funders on how to “encourage and empower credible, authentic, and constructive online Muslim voices” that echo the White House’s 2011 initiative to “counter violent extremist (CVE) narratives on the Internet.”

These efforts are ostensibly to foil online recruitment by al-Qaeda and other Muslim extremist groups, but RAND analysts admit in their own report that “…this [al-Qaeda] campaign has produced an extremely low yield of recruits in the United States and that vast majorities of American Muslims hold no sympathies for al-Qaeda’s distorted vision.” So the true purpose of this expansive initiative lies elsewhere: to control, direct and shape the social and political agenda of Muslims, who they realize are mandated to de-establish the existing oppressive systems and replace them with peace and social justice in the world.

Some of the RAND recommendations to be aware of include the following:

1. Building alliances with existing “rock star imams” that already have huge online followings. “US officials should identify both established and up-and-coming social media personalities and incorporate these individuals into interagency engagement strategies.”

2. Creating new “Web sensations.” This is to be done by developing leaders who have “scholarly credentials, understand and are able to work in an American context, and can speak to young American-born Muslims who may feel disenfranchised from local religious institutions.”

3. Disseminating political information through popular online magazines, virtual masjids, blogs and other portals that cover all aspects of Islamic life. “The key is that efforts placing less emphasis on CVE and security aspects will gain better traction and resonance among many important audience members and promote participation from a broader cadre of influencers.”

4. Funding technology, public relations and marketing training for “Muslim influencers” at home and abroad. Recently, during two-and-a-half day training sessions in Pakistan, the Philippines, Singapore, Malaysia and Jakarta, people were introduced to social media tools such as Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn. “Individuals were taught the basics of how to successfully get a message out, the art of storytelling, and the creation of viral messages.”

History has repeatedly shown that coordinating with imperialists to bring peace and justice is not only folly but also counterproductive. Leaders, movements and organizations directed by the ruling elite don’t speak out against oppressive systems like Zionism, capitalism and globalism and end up supporting extreme violence in the forms of imperialist wars (e.g. Afghanistan and Iraq) and terrorist groups that serve their interests (e.g. al-Qaeda in Libya and Syria).

While this RAND initiative to take on high-tech Islamic personalities is new, sell-out scholars have been around for ages. When Moses (foster son of Asiya, one of the four perfect women of all times) went to the mountains for 40 days, Samiri — a religious scholar and savvy engineer from among the Israelis — used his knowledge and skills to turn the people back to the Pharaonic system and ways. Allah (swt) says in the noble Book, “Said He [Allah], ‘Then [know that], verily, in your absence We have put your people to a test, and Samiri has led them astray’” (20:85).

Imam ‘Ali said, “I warn you about the munafiqs [dual-loyalists]. They are misguided and they misguide as well. They have appeared in society in different colors and with different faces. Their speech is eloquent, profitable and is even a cure for pain. But their actions are like incurable diseases.”

To prevent such false scholars from gaining power and influence, the Muslim masses must be able to identify them, put pressure on them to return to Islamic principles, and if they refuse, abandon them for principled scholars who not only have knowledge but also the courage and strength to speak truth to power — like Talut, a true leader of the Children of Israel mentioned in the Qur’an.

“You think it’s easy to propagate the truth in hostile territory, even if that hostile territory is your own [Islamic] center? It takes bravery,” says scholar Yusuf Husayn. Thanks to social media tools that allow interactions, we can put public pressure on scholars through questions, comments and feedback online.

Imam Khomeini, leader of the 1979 Islamic Revolution in Iran, teaches us how to deal with court scholars when it becomes evident they are cooperating with tyrants and their dual-loyalist enablers. In an open letter he wrote to Hussein Ali Montazeri, the imam informed him that he will no longer be the imam’s successor, “Can you see what valuable services you have offered to arrogance?” Imam Khomeini asks and then gives Montazeri the following advice in his letter:

1. Change your advisors or “bureau.”

2. Because you are “gullible” and “provoked easily,” stay out of political matters.

3. Stop ridiculing scholars truly committed to Islam.

4. Don’t be a “mouthpiece” of the oppressors.

Imam Khomeini said, “Muslims must think about training, controlling, and correcting the leaders… They must use advice or warnings to wake them up from their deep sleep that is killing them and the interests of the Islamic nation. They must not be unaware of the danger of the dual-loyalists and those who work for the arrogant powers of the world.”

For those willing to take on such “leaders,” I also have a tip: get a thick skin. Recently, I questioned a popular American Islamic scholar on Facebook for supporting the Western-backed Syrian opposition. He called me a “lunatic.” 

The writing of Josh Asmat-Gays and Lesbians

A Traditional 'Elitist' and 'Prejudiced' Picture of an Indian Mughal

Let me start with Mughals.Late. Agha Shorish Kashmiri had written a book [I am forgetting the name of book it was either Us Bazar Mein] about Brothels [Kothas] in the Sub-Continent and he had written that Mughals promoted this Chakla [Brothels Culture in India] wherever they established their Forts and Palaces.
A Typical Mughal Painting

This Khota Culture [Brothel Culture] was further promoted by the Muslim Elite Class of Uttar Pradesh specifically Lucknow and Dehli as well [Lahore in Pakistan is not far behind] in the garb of Institutions of Etiquette [Yaani - Tehzeeb O Tammadun Ga Gehwara]

Let me remind you about two books [fine books you must read them]

1- Yadoon Ki Baraat [Memoirs by an Indian then Pakistani Poet] by Late. Josh Maleehabadi [Urdu]

and

2- Lihaf [Quilt] by Late. Ms. Ismat Chughtai [Urdu]

Last chapters of Yaadon Ki Baraat carry numerous love affairs of Shabbir Hassan Khan aka Josh Maleehabadi where in he gave a very grpahic description of love with at least two boys and several married and unmarried ladies. Josh Sahab Romanticised Brothel/Kotha Life of UP and Delhi in his memoirs saying that

"QUOTE"

These institutions are the citadel of culture and etiquette. We send our younger male to learn etiquette.

"UN-QUOTE"

Now tell me is it allow in Indian or Pakistani Culture? Would Josh Sahab or any other honourable person would have sent his younger son to learn etiquette in Brothel. If that is so then why this honour was just restricted to Male Member of Nawab Class of UP, they should have sent their Mother, Daughters and Sisters there to teach all and sundry the etiquette. Do read a book on this Filth [Kotha Culture and Brothel Culture] Us Koochay Mein by Agha Shorish Kashmiri.

Lihaf [Quilt] by Late. Ms. Ismat Chughtai is written on Lesbianism amongst Nawabzadis [Elite in Lucknow, UP India] and Homosexuality amongst male Nawabs of Lucknow. Now tell me is it allow in Indian and Pakistani culture to even discuss these issues.

Mughal Dynasty instead of giving Universities and Education gave the gifts of Shrines [EVEN WORST THEN PROSTITUTE'S DEN no matter Ajmer or Nizamuddin Awliya ot millions of others both in Pakistan or India - please justify their existence in the light of Islam even the most redundant and Anti-Islamic Fatawa-e-Alamgiri cannot justify these Mazars], Forts, and Palaces to Indian Sub-Continent they also gave gifts of Brothels [Chakla/Kotha] to Indian sub-continent.

Do read an indepth book Tareekh-e-Owadh [Lucknow] by Hakeem Muhammad Najamul Ghani Kaanpuri and it will open your eyes as to what had been going around in the so-called Palaces of Nawabs in UP in 17 and 18 Century. Then tell me was that allowed in Indian and Pakistani culture as far as Islamic Point of View is concerned